Precision and Non-Precision Approaches are two categories of instrument approaches that pilots use when navigating to an airport, particularly in low visibility or poor weather conditions. The main difference lies in the type and detail of guidance provided to the pilot during the approach.
1. Precision Approach
Definition: A precision approach provides both lateral (horizontal) and vertical (glideslope) guidance, which helps pilots align not only with the runway centerline but also with the correct descent path.
Key Characteristics:
- Guidance: Lateral and vertical (full) guidance.
- Navigation Systems: Typically uses an Instrument Landing System (ILS), though some precision approaches may use Ground-Based Augmentation Systems (GBAS) or Microwave Landing Systems (MLS). read about (ILS) and (MLS)
- Minimum Decision Altitude: Precision approaches allow for a lower Decision Altitude (DA) than non-precision approaches, which means pilots can descend closer to the runway before deciding to land or go around.
- Greater Accuracy: Due to full guidance, precision approaches allow pilots to safely land in very low visibility conditions and often have lower minimums.
- Example: ILS approaches are the most common type of precision approach, providing a detailed glideslope and localizer for precise alignment.
Advantages:
- Allows for landings in low visibility and cloud cover.
- Reduces the likelihood of going around, as the approach is more controlled and aligned with the runway.
2. Non-Precision Approach
Definition: A non-precision approach only provides lateral guidance, which aligns the aircraft with the runway centerline but does not offer vertical (glideslope) guidance for descent.
Key Characteristics:
- Guidance: Lateral (horizontal) guidance only.
- Navigation Systems: May use systems like VOR (VHF Omnidirectional Range), NDB (Non-Directional Beacon), LNAV (Lateral Navigation) in GPS approaches, or Localizer (LOC) approaches.
- Minimum Descent Altitude: Non-precision approaches have a Minimum Descent Altitude (MDA) rather than a Decision Altitude (DA), so pilots level off at MDA until they acquire visual contact with the runway or are forced to go around if the runway remains unseen.
- Less Accurate: Without vertical guidance, pilots must calculate their descent profile, which can be challenging in low visibility and requires more precise timing.
- Examples: VOR, LOC, LNAV, and NDB approaches.
Advantages:
- Useful in situations where the airport lacks precision approach equipment.
- Some approaches (like RNAV) provide lateral guidance to many more runways, even in remote locations.
If you are interested you should read about Departure Procedure (DPs)
Comparison Chart
| Aspect | Precision Approach | Non-Precision Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Guidance | Lateral and vertical | Lateral only |
| Decision Height/Altitude | Lower DA (closer to runway) | Higher MDA (further from runway) |
| Accuracy | Higher | Lower |
| Common Types | ILS, MLS, GLS | VOR, NDB, LOC, RNAV (LNAV) |
| Best for Low Visibility | Yes | No |
Precision approaches offer comprehensive guidance, which is ideal for low-visibility landings.
Non-precision approaches are still effective but require more pilot skill in maintaining a safe descent, especially in poor weather, due to the lack of vertical guidance.
FAQs
1. What is a Precision Approach?
A precision approach provides both lateral and vertical guidance to a runway, helping pilots align with the runway centerline and maintain the correct descent angle. An Instrument Landing System (ILS) is the most common type of precision approach.
2. What is a Non-Precision Approach?
A non-precision approach provides only lateral guidance, helping the pilot align with the runway but not assisting with vertical descent. Examples include VOR, NDB, and RNAV (non-precision) approaches.
3. What are the main differences between Precision and Non-Precision Approaches?
| Feature | Precision Approach | Non-Precision Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Guidance Provided | Lateral and vertical guidance | Lateral guidance only |
| Descent Profile | Glide slope for a controlled descent | Step-down altitudes |
| Accuracy | High | Moderate |
| Minimum Descent Altitude | Lower than non-precision approaches | Higher than precision approaches |
| Examples | ILS, GLS, PAR | VOR, NDB, RNAV (LNAV), LOC |
4. What is an Instrument Landing System (ILS)?
The ILS is the most widely used precision approach system. It uses ground-based transmitters to provide lateral guidance (localizer) and vertical guidance (glide slope) to pilots for a safe and accurate landing.
5. What is a Localizer-Only Approach?
A localizer-only approach is a non-precision approach that provides lateral guidance using the localizer component of the ILS but lacks vertical guidance, as the glide slope is not used.
6. What is a Glide Slope, and how does it work?
A glide slope is the vertical component of a precision approach, typically set at a 3° descent angle. It helps pilots maintain the correct descent rate to the runway threshold.
7. What is the Decision Altitude (DA) in a Precision Approach?
Decision Altitude (DA) is the altitude at which a pilot must decide to either continue the approach and land (if the runway is visible) or initiate a missed approach.
8. What is the Minimum Descent Altitude (MDA) in a Non-Precision Approach?
MDA is the lowest altitude a pilot can descend to during a non-precision approach without visual reference to the runway. Unlike DA, MDA does not allow for descending below the specified altitude.
9. What are some examples of Non-Precision Approaches?
- VOR Approach: Uses a ground-based VHF Omni-Directional Range (VOR) for lateral guidance.
- NDB Approach: Relies on Non-Directional Beacons for lateral navigation.
- RNAV (LNAV): GPS-based lateral guidance without vertical guidance.
- LOC Approach: Uses only the localizer component of the ILS system.
10. Which approach is more common in modern aviation?
Precision approaches are more common, especially at larger airports, due to their accuracy and safety. However, non-precision approaches are still widely used at smaller airports and as backups.
11. What is the purpose of a step-down fix in a Non-Precision Approach?
A step-down fix is a designated point where pilots can descend to a lower altitude while following a non-precision approach. These fixes help ensure obstacle clearance along the approach path.
12. What is the difference between DA and MDA?
- DA (Decision Altitude): Used in precision approaches. Pilots can descend to the DA and must make a decision to land or go around.
- MDA (Minimum Descent Altitude): Used in non-precision approaches. Pilots must not descend below this altitude unless the runway is visible.
13. Are RNAV (GPS) Approaches Precision or Non-Precision?
RNAV approaches can be either:
- Precision-like: When equipped with LPV (Localizer Performance with Vertical Guidance) or GLS (GBAS Landing System).
- Non-Precision: When providing lateral guidance only (e.g., LNAV).
14. What is an RNP Approach, and how does it fit?
An RNP (Required Navigation Performance) approach is a modern GPS-based approach that can provide precision-like guidance with strict accuracy requirements. It may offer both lateral and vertical guidance, depending on the procedure.
15. Why are Non-Precision Approaches still used?
Non-precision approaches are useful at airports without precision approach systems, in remote areas, or as backup procedures when precision systems are unavailable or inoperative.
16. How do pilots manage vertical guidance in a Non-Precision Approach?
In non-precision approaches, pilots manually calculate descent rates and use step-down altitudes to navigate the descent. In some cases, a vertical descent angle (VDA) is published to assist with continuous descent.
17. What is the purpose of the Missed Approach Procedure?
A missed approach procedure ensures a safe and obstacle-free path for pilots to climb away from the runway if they cannot land due to poor visibility or other factors.
18. Can a Non-Precision Approach become a Precision Approach?
Yes, advancements in navigation technology, such as GPS with LPV capability, can effectively make non-precision approaches provide precision-like guidance.
19. What is a PAR (Precision Approach Radar)?
PAR is a precision approach guided by air traffic controllers using radar to provide both lateral and vertical guidance. It’s primarily used in military aviation.
20. How do pilots decide between a Precision and Non-Precision Approach?
The decision depends on:
- Airport infrastructure (availability of ILS or GPS LPV).
- Weather conditions (precision approaches are preferred in low visibility).
- Aircraft equipment and capabilities.
21. Which approach is safer: Precision or Non-Precision?
Precision approaches are generally safer due to the added vertical guidance, which reduces the risk of Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT). However, non-precision approaches can be safely flown with proper training and situational awareness.
22. What are some challenges of Non-Precision Approaches?
- Greater workload for pilots due to manual descent calculations.
- Higher risk of descending below the MDA if not vigilant.
- Less precise lateral and vertical guidance.
23. Are all airports equipped with Precision Approaches?
No, not all airports have precision approach systems. Many smaller or remote airports rely solely on non-precision approaches due to cost and infrastructure limitations.
24. How does technology impact Precision and Non-Precision Approaches?
Advancements in GPS and satellite-based navigation are bridging the gap between precision and non-precision approaches, making approaches safer and more accurate, even at airports without traditional precision systems.
Aviator Tells 
Leave a comment